When I interviewed Obama Girl AKA Amber Lee Ettinger and the show’s creator, Ben Relles at a YouTube Live after party in San Francisco last month I was wondering what Barely Political would do after Obama took office and how they would take Obama Girl’s goal of getting Obama elected and turn it into something else.
Well, through the use of editing and special effects the team at Barely Political has turned Obama Girl from a hopeful fan into a full fledged stalker by having her singing a duet with Barack Obama and it’s pretty funny. The Obama Girl + Obama Duet! video is already climbing the charts on YouTube and I’m sure that it will rack up 5 million or more views this week. That’s better than many TV shows will do this week. But with 5 Million views why won’t this online viral video get TV advertising dollars?
I really wasn’t sure how Obama Girl was going to stay alive after the election but with this one little tweak Barley Political will now be able to continue their use of spectacle and story by grabbing future Obama sound bites and having Obam interact with Obama Girl. It’s a formula that should work. My only concern for Barely Political is cost. Obama Girl is a labor of love that has turned into a small corporate endeavor. The song is written and mixed by Michael Gregory, performed by Leah Kauffman and Barack Obama edited by Michael Stevens and who knows how many people were involved with the video and graphics teams and don’t forget the producers, directors and Amber Lee Ettinger. It’s not the Daily Show (It would be awesome to see Obama Girl Segments on The Daily Show) but one episode costs more to produce than most single segments on the Daily Show. Now keep in mind, Obama Girl is not getting the advertising income that The Daily Show is getting even though on a per segment viewing Obama Girl is getting more eyeballs than The Daily Show (I don’t know this for a fact.)
Online videos and downloadable videos for that matter are more engaging that TV, radio or news paper and they are more actionable. You can’t yet click your regular TV and buy a product but online video has that power. Web video is way more valuable for advertising and marketing than TV because it is trackable. If only Obama Girl (which according to TubeMogul has over 120 Million video views) could get TV advertising rates then it would open the door forthe rest of us online video producers and we would could live happily ever after. Right?
They say that what makes a great character is someone who is blind to their own faults. Obama Girl has no idea she is a stalker. She just wants to see Obama in the White House where they can live happily ever after… together. Online video producers are much the same. We can’t see that we are giving away valuable content for free. We love to make videos. We love to share them with the world. We just want to have sponsors land on our websites with big bags of money and beg us to place their products on our videos and live happily ever after…together. We are blind to our own faults. Why aren’t we getting TV advertising CPM?
I have a few ideas.
Here are a few things that I can think of off the top of my head as to why web videos aren’t getting TV advertising rates but I’m sure there are more.
1. It’s not easy for media buyers to buy online video inventory.
If a media buyer has a million dollars to spend it’s hard to find that much inventory and be able to buy it with one of two deals. No media buyer wants to negotiate 58 different deals with 58 different online video producers.
2. With a single media buy Web video doesn’t have the reach to move the needle for a national advertiser.
If you are a Hollywood movie studio you can’t yet do a web video buy that’s going to move the needle and put butts in theater seats this weekend. You could build awareness over a month’s time but it’s going to take a lot of work buying the media to do it.
3. Advertising agencies don’t have control of the web video inventory yet and can’t make money without a lot of effort negotiating with individual producers/publishers.
Advertising agencies are use to buying TV inventory in advance or “UPFRONT.” The online video world isn’t set up that way yet.
4. Video Producers don’t know what their inventory is or how to sell it.
Many online video producers know what pre-rolls and post-rolls are but they don’t know how they could install the technology to dynamically deliver video ads in front of their videos and even if they did they don’t know how many available spots they have to sell. Nor do they have a media kit that explains to a media buyer what they have to sell.
5. Video producers don’t speak advertising.
Many Internet video producers have never heard advertising terms like: Adjacency, Affiliate, Avails, Average Frequency, Average Quarter-Hour Rating, Barter, Bonus Spot, Brand Development Index, Break Position, Broadcast Calendar, Category Development Index, Clearance, Clutter, Coverage Area, CPA, CPC, CPM, Cumulative Audience, Cut-In, Daypart, DMA, Diary, Direct Response Advertising, Efficiency, Exclusivity, First Refusal, Fixed Position, Flighting, Flow Chart, Gross Impressions, GRP’s, Guarantee, Heavy-up, Hiatus, Little America (or Little U.S.), LNA, Log, Mail-Order Advertising, Makegood, Media Kit, MRI, Net Cost, Penetration, PI, Psychographic, Quintile, Rate Card, Rating, Reach, Roll Out, Roadblocking, Share, SOV, Short Rate, SMRB, Sponsorship, SRDS, Starch, Sweeps, Telmar, Upfront, Vehicle.
6. Web Video Producers Don’t KNow How To Sell Advertising
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, creative people think the word “Sales” is a dirty word. We are OK with the word, “Pitch” but selling is not something we are comfortable with. We need to change this.
Do you have any others to add?
If you are interested in advertising or sponsoring an online video please contact me. I have many friends in online video and can hook you up with inventory that will help you reach your marketing goals.
If you are an online video producer looking for advertisers or sponsors. I can help you build out your inventory and connect you with advertisers and sponsors.

